Journal article published in Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies, volume 35, pp. 21–28.
Authors:
.Abstract
Electrolyzed water (EW) has recently attracted much attention due to its efficacy against a broad spectrum of microorganisms. In this study, we investigated the impact of two EW treatments (40 and 400 mg/L free chlorine) on grape mycobiota using culture-dependent and -independent approaches. Moreover, the effect of yeast inoculation on treated and non-treated grapes was also considered. At the end of the fermentation, the wines produced were subjected to chemical and aroma analyses. The results revealed a decrease of about 0.5 log CFU/mL of the total yeast population on grapes surface independently of the dose of EW applied. Yeast inoculation and EW treatments shortened the time needed by Saccharomyces cerevisiae to dominate apiculate yeasts, particularly, 2 days for inoculated and 7 days for spontaneous fermentations. A decrease of acetic acid (about 55 %) was also observed compared to untreated spontaneous fermentation. In addition, aroma analysis highlighted a positive contribution of inoculated yeast on the wine aromas, since they had approximately 50 % higher pleasant esters compared to spontaneous fermented wines. \\ Industrial Relevance: Sulfur dioxide is widely used in crushed grapes prior to fermentation due to its antimicrobial and antioxidant activity. However, legislative rules, health risks and negative consumer perception related to its presence and use have resulted in a need to find new sanitizers able to reduce its use. The effectiveness of EW to reduce yeast species able to produce high levels of undesirable compounds was demonstrated. This research introduced an innovative antimicrobial agent, which could assist in the first step of wine production to reduce the use of SO₂.
Key words electrolyzed water; grape; wine; yeast dynamics; sanitization; innovative treatment
BibTeX entry: click to show
@article{ 2318_1581643, url = {https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1581643}, author = {Cravero, Francesco and Englezos, Vasileios and Torchio, Fabrizio and Giacosa, Simone and Río Segade, Susana and Gerbi, Vincenzo and Rantsiou, Kalliopi and Rolle, Luca and Cocolin, Luca}, title = {Post-harvest control of wine-grape mycobiota using electrolyzed water}, year = {2016}, journal = {Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies}, volume = {35}, abstract = {Electrolyzed water (EW) has recently attracted much attention due to its efficacy against a broad spectrum of microorganisms. In this study, we investigated the impact of two EW treatments (40 and 400 mg/L free chlorine) on grape mycobiota using culture-dependent and -independent approaches. Moreover, the effect of yeast inoculation on treated and non-treated grapes was also considered. At the end of the fermentation, the wines produced were subjected to chemical and aroma analyses. The results revealed a decrease of about 0.5 log CFU/mL of the total yeast population on grapes surface independently of the dose of EW applied. Yeast inoculation and EW treatments shortened the time needed by Saccharomyces cerevisiae to dominate apiculate yeasts, particularly, 2 days for inoculated and 7 days for spontaneous fermentations. A decrease of acetic acid (about 55 \%) was also observed compared to untreated spontaneous fermentation. In addition, aroma analysis highlighted a positive contribution of inoculated yeast on the wine aromas, since they had approximately 50 \% higher pleasant esters compared to spontaneous fermented wines. \\ Industrial Relevance: Sulfur dioxide is widely used in crushed grapes prior to fermentation due to its antimicrobial and antioxidant activity. However, legislative rules, health risks and negative consumer perception related to its presence and use have resulted in a need to find new sanitizers able to reduce its use. The effectiveness of EW to reduce yeast species able to produce high levels of undesirable compounds was demonstrated. This research introduced an innovative antimicrobial agent, which could assist in the first step of wine production to reduce the use of SO₂.}, keywords = {electrolyzed water; grape; wine; yeast dynamics; sanitization; innovative treatment}, doi = {10.1016/j.ifset.2016.03.010}, pages = {21--28} }
Publication availability
Accepted manuscript
This file is available in an accepted manuscript version from the IRIS institutional repository.
This file is subjected to usage limitations according to its license.
View or request this publication
You can find the postprint version of this article in the Open Access Repository of the University of Torino:
IRIS-AperTO record 2318/1581643
View the final version at publisher:
doi:10.1016/j.ifset.2016.03.010
File not available? Do you need further information?
You can contact me and request this article through the following form: